Is it really possible for the entire center-left to join together into a single ‘super-party,’ as the center-right did in 1973 with the formation of ‘Likud’ (meaning ‘unification’)?

We discuss the potential costs and benefits of the left hanging together.

 

This is a segment from The Promised Podcast: Listen to the full show.

 

subscribe to the podcast

4 comments on “A ‘Likud’ for the Left?

  1. WiredSoprano says:

    What is the name of the Avnery article you are referring to?

      1. WiredSoprano says:

        Thank you

  2. WiredSoprano says:

    As mentioned, I’d see the big problem here being the egos involved deciding who to lead the party. I’d like to see them agree to put together a unified front in principle before deciding the leader. As part of that agreement would be a decision to allow public polling/referendum (a primaries of sorts) to determine who the leader will ultimately be. The players involved would all agree to get behind the party and respect the decision of constituents as to who the leader would be once that decision is made. Choosing the leader first seems only destined for failure, or at best, a drawn out process with energy wasted on battling each other that could be used more productively.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Listen on your favorite podcast app

Join our weekly newsletter

Receive Our Latest Podcast Episodes by Email

(and not a thing more)